Office of Steam Logo_1

Author Topic: Holy Grail Historic Piece from Rhode Island Auction Seth Wilmarth 1874 Water Motor or Steam Engine  (Read 3070 times)

  • Administrator
  • Engineer
  • *****
  • Posts: 5070
  • Location: Connecticut - USA
Gil, amazing engine. Thank you for sharing your photos and video. Where/how does the water discharge/exhaust ? Don


Hi Don, This is explained in the video above and with more detail in the patent.

  • Administrator
  • Engineer
  • *****
  • Posts: 5070
  • Location: Connecticut - USA
I was ready for this one for sure.


I began collecting research on this engine back in 2007 when I first learned of their existence.


Gil

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 563
  • Location: Minnesota
An awesome artifact! I noticed that engines seem to have more power under steam than air. I believe it to due to the density of the propellant.

So under water propellant does the engine have more torque?

Very clever eccentric. After seeing that design I am surprised others haven't pick it up since. Although spring loaded cams do the same. Which begs another question, would spring loaded roller cams give better valve timing than an eccentric?

The patent is interesting, the main issue with water engines is the incompressible nature of water. So his valve design is to reduce the "pound" at the end of the strokes. Some steam engines are designed to intentionally *open* the steam early to provide some cushion at the end of the stroke, very bad for water engines.

Watching the video, the engine isn't that smooth via water, so probably why it didn't catch on? Seems like the valve timing still has pounding issues? I wonder if a pressure relief valve on both ends would have helped? Full size engines sometimes have that. (A 26hp Minneapolis engine does.)

*Corrections as per Gil's reply

  • Administrator
  • Engineer
  • *****
  • Posts: 5070
  • Location: Connecticut - USA
Given that the engine is now more than 145 years old, it is hard to say of the timing is still set correctly which is critical to smooth operation on water. Steam and air are more forgiving. Steam inlets closing early is an efficiency measure applied to let the expanding steam continue to work without putting in steam not needed. Steam inlets opening early can help provide a padding effect for steam and air engines. Water motors do not have the luxury of expansion. Both air and steam under pressure will expand back to atmospheric pressure quickly and provide that extra efficiency. The water motors would also not likely ever run as fast as a steam engine is capable of. I believe that for power, the pressure applied by air, water, and steam should all give the same torque at the same level. I don't believe a water motor with reciprocating pistons would ever be capable of high speed high powered operation. These were designed to run off a municipal water supply or off the water pressure from a cistern in the attic of a taller house.

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 563
  • Location: Minnesota
Gil,

Thank you for pointing out it's opening the inlet early for the buffer. I shouldn't have confused it with early cut-off for expansion.

I suspect the difference I see in the same engine with compressed air vs steam mat be due to early cut-off. A steam engine under steam will gain benefit from early cut-off but with compressed air... Nope.

I noticed that on some no-regulator Falls, the cut-off is quite early.

  • Administrator
  • Engineer
  • *****
  • Posts: 5070
  • Location: Connecticut - USA
Actually an engine on compressed air if pulling a load will be able to take advantage of the expansion but probably not as much as steam.

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4122
  • Location: Plano, Texas
An awesome find and a great story.

Congratulations!

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1076
  • Location: Gahanna, Ohio
Well done Gil - your interest and awareness paid off big time!
Regards,
Larry